Return To The Previous Page
Buy a Package
Number Of Visible Items Remaining : 3 Item

Summary of indications for radiologic evaluation of the cervical spine in children and adolescents with blunt trauma

Summary of indications for radiologic evaluation of the cervical spine in children and adolescents with blunt trauma
Radiologic study History and physical
None Low risk mechanism of injury, and
No multiple system trauma with substantial injuries to head, face, or torso and no high-risk biomechanics*, and
No conditions that predispose to cervical spine injury, and
Awake (GCS score 14 or 15) and cooperative with exam, and
Normal neck and neurologic examination
Lateral, AP, odontoid radiographs High-risk mechanisms of injury or biomechanics*, or
Multiple system trauma with substantial injuries to head, face, or torso, or
Conditions that predispose to cervical spine injury, or
Altered mental status (GCS <14), or
Neck pain, tenderness, deformity, or limitation of movement
Computed tomography of the C-spine Acute neurologic deficit (instead of plain radiographs), or
GCS score ≤8 (instead of plain radiographs), or
As part of initial evaluation of patients with head injury and altered mental status (GCS score 9 to 13) instead of plain films, or
Abnormal or suspicious C-spine on plain radiographs, or
High index of suspicion for C-spine injury despite normal plain cervical radiographs
Flexion-extension radiographs§ Normal C-spine films, and
No neurologic deficit referable to C-spine, and
Continued neck pain, tenderness, or muscle spasm, and
Able to actively flex and extend neck for the examination
MRI Children with an abnormal neurologic examination and those requiring imaging of the soft tissues of the spinal column and spinal cord (eg, patients with normal plain films but persistent concern for neurologic injury based upon history, patients with prolonged loss of consciousness in whom cervical spine cannot be cleared by 24 to 72 hours post injury)

GCS: Glasgow coma scale; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

* High-risk mechanisms include injuries caused by diving, hanging, axial load to the head, clotheslining force, or motor vehicle crashes (speed >55 mph, death of occupant, partial or complete ejection, and intrusion into the passenger compartment [12 inches at sides 18 inches at roof]). Patients with painful injuries not due to high-risk mechanisms for cervical spine injury (eg, isolated extremity fracture despite low force mechanism) may still undergo clinical clearance.

¶ For example, Down syndrome, Klippel Feil syndrome, Morquio syndrome, Larsen syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, cervical arthritis, prior cervical spine injury, or cervical spine surgery.

Δ Able to move head in flexion and extension and rotate 45 degrees to both sides without pain.

◊ Odontoid plain radiographs may be omitted in uncooperative children. However, children with possible upper cervical spine injury by history or physical examination should undergo computed tomography of C1.

§ If biomechanics of injury and clinical findings do not indicate a high index of suspicion for ligamentous injury, flexion-extensions radiographs may be deferred to outpatient follow-up.
References:
  1. Herman MJ, Brown KO, Sponseller PD, et al. Pediatric cervical spine clearance: A consensus statement and algorithm from the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:e1.
  2. Chung S, Mikrogianakis A, Wales PW, et al. Trauma Association of Canada Pediatric Subcommittee national pediatric cervical spine evaluation pathway: Consensus guidelines. J Trauma 2011; 70:873.
Graphic 79881 Version 14.0

Do you want to add Medilib to your home screen?