INTRODUCTION — Prenatal exposure to alcohol is the leading preventable cause of congenital anomalies and developmental disabilities. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a term that is used to describe the range of physical, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental effects that can occur in an individual who was prenatally exposed to alcohol and may have lifelong implications and high societal costs [1,2].
This topic will discuss the clinical features and diagnosis of FASD. The management, prognosis, and prevention of FASD and alcohol use in pregnancy are discussed separately. (See "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Management and prognosis" and "Alcohol intake and pregnancy".)
TERMINOLOGY — FASD is an umbrella term that encompasses the range of physical, mental health, behavioral, and cognitive effects that can occur in individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure [3-5]. In most classification systems, FASD is not a diagnostic term but describes a group of specific conditions with mild to severe phenotypes; the conditions include (table 1) [6,7]:
●Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS)
●Partial fetal alcohol syndrome (pFAS)
●Alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (ARND)
●Neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE), sometimes called neurodevelopmental disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure
●Alcohol-related birth defects (ARBD)
The terminology for FASD continues to evolve within and between professional societies [3,8-14]. As examples:
●ND-PAE was introduced as a condition for further study in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and retained this status in the DSM-5, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) [15,16]. ARND and ND-PAE describe the neurobehavioral effects of prenatal alcohol exposure without facial dysmorphology or growth abnormalities [9,13]. They are similar, but not completely overlapping (table 1) [9,17]; both are clinically useful.
●The 2015 Canadian Guidelines for diagnosis of FASD across the lifespan recognized FASD as a diagnostic term and introduced some new terminology and diagnostic criteria for FASD, including an "at risk" category (table 2) [8].
●The 2016 Australian guidelines and the 2019 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network align with the 2015 Canadian guidelines and divide FASD into two subcategories: FASD with three sentinel facial features and FASD with less than three sentinel facial features [2,18].
●The 2016 National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) consensus guidelines retained the diagnostic categories established by the Institute of Medicine in 1996 (ie, FAS, pFAS, ARND, and ARBD) (table 1) [9]. (See 'Diagnostic criteria for FASD' below.)
Terms that have been used to describe clinical or neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal alcohol exposure in the past or are less commonly used include "fetal alcohol effects" and "neurodevelopmental disorder/alcohol-exposed" or "static encephalopathy/alcohol-exposed" [7,10].
PATHOGENESIS — Alcohol is a teratogen with irreversible central nervous system effects [19]. Several factors contribute to variable susceptibility to the teratogenic effects of alcohol [20-30]. These include the quantity and pattern (eg, binge drinking, daily drinking) of alcohol consumption, maternal and fetal genetics (including maternal genetic variation in alcohol-metabolizing rates [30], maternal age, maternal nutrition, maternal smoking, and intrauterine environment.
A "safe" threshold or pattern of alcohol consumption has not been identified [5,20,31-35]. The fetus is particularly vulnerable to maternal alcohol consumption because of inefficient elimination and prolonged exposure [36]. Alcohol is eliminated from the fetal compartment at a rate of only 3 to 4 percent of the maternal rate. In addition, much of the alcohol excreted by the fetus into the amniotic fluid is "recycled" through fetal swallowing of amniotic fluid and intramembranous absorption.
Alcohol has the potential to cause deleterious effects at all stages of gestation [33,37-39]. Significant alcohol exposure during the first trimester is associated with facial anomalies and major structural anomalies, including brain anomalies [37]; exposure in the second trimester increases the risk of spontaneous abortion; exposure in the third trimester predominantly affects weight, length, and brain growth [37,40-42]. However, neurobehavioral effects may occur with a range of exposures throughout gestation, even in the absence of facial or structural brain anomalies. (See "Alcohol intake and pregnancy", section on 'Safe level of alcohol intake'.)
Neuroimaging and pathologic studies in humans and animal models of prenatal alcohol exposure demonstrate abnormal brain structure, function, and structural and microstructural development following even low levels of prenatal alcohol exposure, although a consistent pattern has not been identified [43-45]. The range of abnormalities includes reduced brain volume with specific reductions in the frontal lobe, striatum and caudate nucleus, thalamus, hippocampus, and cerebellum; thinning of the corpus callosum; and abnormal functioning of the amygdala [46-55]. Abnormalities may vary by FASD subtype; studies suggest that these brain areas are smaller in children with FAS and pFAS than in children with ARND and ND-PAE [56]. These areas influence cognition, impulse control and judgment, emotional processing, transfer of information between the hemispheres, memory and learning, motor coordination, ability to work toward goals, spatial perception, and perception of time [46-54]. One neuroimaging study found an association between low brain volume and lower cognitive and executive function among children and adolescents with FASD [57]. However, in another study that compared brain MRIs obtained approximately 20 years apart, the rate of cortical volume decline was similar among individuals with and without FASD [58]. This finding suggests that alcohol affects the brain volume early on but does not accelerate subsequent deterioration.
In addition, increasing numbers of epigenetic studies correlate alcohol exposure in utero with alteration of DNA methylation and gene expression in animal models and humans [59-61]. This can play a role in placental and fetal growth and in brain structure (particularly in the hippocampal region) and function [62], which may be compounded by environmental toxic stress, including emotional deprivation [63].
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Prevalence — Estimates of the prevalence of FASD vary with the study population, method of ascertainment, and the definition [64-69]. In a meta-analysis of 24 studies with active case ascertainment, the estimated global prevalence of FASD in the general population of children age 0 to 16.4 years was 0.77 percent (95% CI 0.5-1.2 percent) [64]. The prevalence was highest (2 percent) in the WHO European region and lowest (0.01 percent) in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region but may have been underestimated in some countries because of inadequate methods of identification or stigma related to alcohol consumption. The prevalence of FASD in the United States was 1.5 percent. In a subsequent cross-sectional study with active case surveillance among 13,146 first-grade children from four diverse regions of the United States, conservative estimates of prevalence ranged from 1.1 to 5 percent [66].
In meta-analyses, the prevalence of FASD is increased in Aboriginal Australian children, children who are Indigenous People in Canada, Native American and Alaska Native children, children in foster care or orphanages, adopted children, children in the juvenile justice system, children receiving special education, children in psychiatric care, and in populations with low socioeconomic status [64,67,70,71].
Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is less common than other types of FASD. In the cross-sectional study, among the 222 children with an FASD, 12 percent met criteria for FAS, 47 percent met criteria for partial FAS, and 41 percent met criteria for alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder [66].
The prevalence of FAS increases with increasing alcohol consumption during pregnancy, as illustrated by observational studies demonstrating a prevalence of FAS of 0.2 percent in the general United States population at a time when the prevalence of maternal alcohol consumption was 12.2 percent [72-74]; a prevalence of FAS of 1 percent in a single county foster care population with a prevalence of maternal alcohol consumption ranging from 15 to 48 percent [75]; and a prevalence of FAS of 4.7 percent in the Washington State Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Diagnostic and Prevention Network cohort, with a prevalence of alcohol consumption of 100 percent [76].
The prevalence of alcohol consumption during pregnancy is discussed separately. (See "Alcohol intake and pregnancy", section on 'Epidemiology of alcohol use and screening'.)
Risk in subsequent pregnancies — The risk of FASD in subsequent pregnancies is high if mothers continue to drink alcohol (estimated to be as high as 70 percent based on data from observational studies) [77]. This highlights the need to evaluate other children born to the same mother, even if they no longer live with the biologic family [78].
Risk factors — Children are at greater risk for FASD if they have a sibling with an FASD, have ever lived in an orphanage or been placed in foster care, are in psychiatric care, or have current or past involvement with child protective services or the juvenile justice system [64,75,77,79,80].
Maternal and psychosocial risk factors for FASD include [11,81-85]:
●Higher maternal age
●Higher gravidity and parity
●History of miscarriages and stillbirths
●Inadequate prenatal care
●Poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy
●History of FASD in previous children
●Substance use, including tobacco
●Mental health problems, including depression
●History of physical or sexual abuse
●Social isolation, including living in a rural area during pregnancy
●Intimate partner violence
●Alcohol and drug use by the mother's intimate partner at the time of pregnancy
●Other maternal family members with substance use at the time of pregnancy
●Poverty
Despite these risk factors, all women are at risk of giving birth to a child with an FASD if they consume alcohol during pregnancy.
CLINICAL FEATURES
Spectrum of findings — The clinical features of FASD include three characteristic facial features (short palpebral fissures, thin vermillion border, and smooth philtrum) (picture 1), central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities, and growth retardation [3,9,10,86]. Various combinations of these features form the criteria for the diagnoses of (table 1):
●Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS)
●Partial fetal alcohol syndrome (pFAS)
●Alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (ARND) [87]
●Alcohol-related birth defects (ARBD)
●Neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE)
FAS and pFAS tend to be more recognizable than ARND and ND-PAE because of the characteristic facial dysmorphology and growth retardation. Other congenital anomalies may be observed in individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure, which helps to make a diagnosis of ARBD. However, physical features of prenatal alcohol exposure are absent in as many of 75 percent of affected children [88].
Timing of presentation — Most individuals with an FASD are diagnosed during childhood [76,89]. The predominant clinical features vary with age [85,90]. Facial dysmorphism may be apparent at birth (though may not be recognized). Growth restriction may occur prenatally or postnatally. CNS impairment may not be apparent until the child is in school [91], although cognitive, motor, and language deficits can present in infants and toddlers without clear physical features [35]. One longitudinal cohort study suggested that a combination of dysmorphology, growth, and neurobehavioral features may identify children with an FASD by 9 to 18 months of age [85].
In a longitudinal study, the FASD physical phenotype was more obvious during early childhood (when small head circumference and small palpebral features were more apparent) and school age (when thin upper lip and weight and height retardation were stable) and less obvious during puberty (when height retardation was masked by the adolescent growth spurt) [90].
Facial dysmorphism and minor anomalies — Short palpebral fissures, thin vermillion border, and smooth philtrum are the characteristic facial dysmorphisms of FASD (picture 1). These characteristic dysmorphisms are required for a diagnosis of FAS, and pFAS but are not necessary to diagnose ND-PAE (which may be more difficult to recognize in their absence) (table 1) [3,9,10]. Facial features may be less distinctive (but still present) after puberty [92,93].
Other facial features and minor congenital anomalies may occur in pFAS and FAS but are not included in the diagnostic criteria [94-97]. In a cohort study of 1726 children with pFAS and FAS, the frequency of minor congenital anomalies was higher in FAS except for ear anomalies [97]:
Head and facial anomalies:
●Hypoplastic midface – 31 versus 47 percent
●Decreased intercanthal distance (≤25th percentile) – 23 versus 32 percent
●Ptosis – 9 versus 32 percent
●Strabismus – 4 versus 16 percent
●"Railroad track" ears (ie, a prominent horizontal crus and prominent and parallel inferior crus of the anthelix) (figure 1) – 9 versus 5 percent
Limb anomalies:
●5th finger clinodactyly – 27 versus 53 percent
●Altered palmar crease (eg, "hockey stick" configuration of the upper palmar crease) (figure 2) – 20 versus 37 percent
●Single transverse palmar crease – 4 versus 16 percent
●Camptodactyly – 4 versus 16 percent
●Limited elbow pronosupination – 4 versus 5 percent
Structural congenital anomalies and other abnormalities — Prenatal alcohol exposure may result in structural congenital anomalies and other abnormalities that usually occur in conjunction with other findings that are more characteristic of FASD and helpful in diagnosing ARBD. Abnormalities may occur in the following systems [9,76,96,98-101]:
●Cardiac – The reported prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) in children with FAS is approximately 2 percent [9], which is somewhat higher than the prevalence in the general population (approximately 1 percent). (See "Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry", section on 'Prevalence of critical congenital heart disease'.)
Associated CHD defects may include atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and conotruncal heart defects (eg, aberrant great vessels, Tetralogy of Fallot). (See "Isolated atrial septal defects (ASDs) in children: Classification, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical features' and "Isolated ventricular septal defects (VSDs) in infants and children: Anatomy, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical features' and "Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF): Pathophysiology, clinical features, and diagnosis" and "Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF): Pathophysiology, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical features'.)
●Skeletal – Large joint flexion contractures, pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum, Klippel-Feil syndrome, vertebral segmentation defect, hemivertebrae, scoliosis, radioulnar synostosis, hypoplastic nails, shortened fifth digits, clinodactyly of the fifth finger, camptodactyly.
●Kidney – Aplastic, dysplastic, hypoplastic kidney, or horseshoe kidney; ureteral duplications, hydronephrosis. (See "Overview of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT)" and "Renal ectopic and fusion anomalies".)
●Ocular – Strabismus, ptosis, retinal vascular anomalies including abnormal retinal tortuosity, optic nerve hypoplasia and small optic discs, refractive problems secondary to microphthalmia, subnormal stereoacuity, and impaired fixation ability [102,103]. Vision problems were reported in 28 percent of patients from one large series [76]. (See "Evaluation and management of strabismus in children" and "Congenital and acquired abnormalities of the optic nerve", section on 'Hypoplasia' and "Vision screening and assessment in infants and children".)
●Auditory – Conductive or sensorineural hearing loss [76,104]; in one large series, chronic hearing loss occurred in 18 percent of patients with an FASD [76]. (See "Hearing loss in children: Screening and evaluation".)
Central nervous system involvement — CNS involvement (clear evidence of brain involvement or neurobehavioral impairment) is a characteristic feature of FASD and required for a diagnosis of FAS, pFAS, ARND, and ND-PAE (table 1) [3,9,10].
Types of central nervous system involvement — Approximately 70 percent of children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure (>4 drinks at least once per week or >14 drinks per week throughout the pregnancy) have neurobehavioral effects, even if they do not meet criteria for FAS [105,106]. In a series of 1400 individuals (newborn to adult) with confirmed alcohol exposure (any level), 90 percent presented with moderate to severe neurobehavioral effects [76]. However, approximately 85 percent had other prenatal and postnatal risk factors that contribute to neurobehavioral problems (eg, poor prenatal care, exposure to illicit drugs, family history of learning disabilities, neglect, abuse, etc).
CNS involvement in FASD may result in a complex range of neurodevelopmental and behavioral disabilities that may not be apparent until the child is in school [40,91,107]. The clinical manifestations may vary from patient to patient, and in individual patients, performance may vary from day to day [78,108].
The manifestations of CNS involvement may vary with age [9,78,92,109-111]:
●Infancy – Irritability, jitteriness, autonomic instability, problems regulating state (eg, sleep, attention, arousal), and delayed development
●Childhood – Hyperactivity, inattention, cognitive impairment (including intellectual disability), emotional reactivity, learning disabilities, hypotonia, auditory and visual impairment, seizures, deficits in memory and reasoning
●Adolescence and young adulthood – Adverse effects related to primary deficits in social skills, adaptive function, and executive function (eg, school disruption, inability to maintain employment, inappropriate sexual behavior) (see 'Associated problems' below)
CNS involvement usually is classified as structural, neurologic, or functional.
●Structural abnormalities include decreased head circumference (usually defined as ≤10th percentile for age and sex or if height and weight are <10th percentile, head circumference ≤3rd percentile) or structural abnormalities on neuroimaging (eg, reduction in size or change in shape of the corpus callosum, cerebellum, or basal ganglia) [3,4,9,10].
In one series of 1400 patients with an FASD, 12 percent had microcephaly (defined by head circumference <3rd percentile) [76]. Microcephaly was more frequent among patients with FAS or pFAS than other FASDs (45 versus 25 percent). Among those who underwent imaging, 18 percent had magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities.
●Neurologic abnormalities include "hard" neurologic signs (eg, abnormal reflexes, abnormal tone, cranial nerve deficits) and recurrent seizures that are not due to postnatal insult or infection [4,9].
●Functional abnormalities may occur in multiple domains [3,76,87,112]. While there is a wide spectrum of phenotypic presentations, the following manifestations have been observed in longitudinal and case-control studies:
•Cognitive – The overall intelligence quotient (IQ) of individuals with an FASD is usually above the threshold for intellectual disability (ie, 70) but may range from 20 to 120; children with FAS tend to have lower IQs than children with pFAS, ARND, or ND-PAE [92,113]; in a population of 1400 individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure, 8 percent had IQ <70; among the 154 with FAS, 20 percent had IQ <70 [76].
Difficulties in arithmetic are the most common, but difficulties in reading and spelling also may occur; other cognitive problems may include impaired memory and slow processing speed [3,88,92,114,115]. Relative areas of cognitive strength include verbal abilities, particularly vocabulary and grammatical skills [3].
•Executive function (eg, difficulty planning and relating cause and effect; failure to consider consequences of actions; poor organization; impaired judgment; inability to generalize knowledge from one situation to another) [3,92].
•Memory problems, including getting lost in new or familiar locations and forgetting recent events, how to perform specific tasks, content of conversations, placement of items around the house, and everyday routines [116].
•Motor function (eg, poor gross motor coordination, poor fine motor and visual-spatial coordination [eg, poor handwriting legibility and speed], hypotonia) [113,117-119]. A 2014 meta-analysis of 10 observational studies found an association between diagnosis of FASD or moderate to heavy prenatal alcohol exposure and gross motor impairment (odds ratio 2.9, 95% CI 2.1-4.0) [120]. Impaired gross motor skills included balance, coordination, and ball skills (eg, throwing, catching, kicking).
•Problems with hyperactivity, attention, or concentration (eg, difficulty encoding information and difficulty shifting aspects of attention [eg, from visual to auditory targets]), which appear to differ from "classic" attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (eg, problems with focus and sustaining attention) [92,121,122].
•Social skills and adaptive function (eg, poor understanding of social cues, seeming lack of remorse after misbehaving, lack of appropriate initiative, lack of reciprocal friendships, social withdrawal, poor personal hygiene; gullibility) [88,92,123-127]. These occur despite evidence of high levels of social motivation [124] and friendliness [128] in some individuals.
Associated problems — Problems associated with the neurobehavioral effects of prenatal alcohol exposure may include:
●Abnormal eating behaviors and eating difficulties (eg, oral aversion and sensitivity to texture, difficulty chewing and handling silverware, pica, poor appetite), which may contribute to postnatal growth retardation [129].
●Sleep problems including sleep onset delay, night awakenings, parasomnias, sleep disordered breathing, and daytime sleepiness [130].
●Difficulty getting along with peers related to poor social skills and vulnerability to bullying and abuse [3,88,92]. In a large case series of patients with an FASD, nearly 70 percent had social problems [76].
●Unrealistic expectations or being labeled as "lazy" or "oppositional" if caregivers and/or educators believe that they are functioning at higher levels than they actually are (based on their relative strength in language) or if the expectations are based on a particularly good day (given the wide variability in day-to-day performance) [3,78].
●Difficulty with activities of daily living may lead to lack of independence in adolescence and adulthood and difficulty maintaining employment [92,110].
●Disrupted school experience (eg, suspended, expelled, dropped out); in a large case series of patients with an FASD, 14 percent of children and 53 percent of adolescents and adults had disrupted school experience [76].
●Problems with impulse control and judgment may lead to inappropriate sexual behaviors (eg, exposure, inappropriate sexual advances or touching, promiscuity). In a series of 415 patients with an FASD, repeated inappropriate sexual behaviors were reported in 39 percent of children, 48 percent of adolescents, and 52 percent of adults [88]; inappropriate sexual behavior among female individuals with an FASD was associated with a personal history of physical or sexual violence.
●In older children and adolescents, the combination of strong verbal skills (vocabulary, grammar) but low receptive language ability [131], low social-communication [131], naïve social skills, and difficulty with impulse control and judgment may lead to participation in criminal activity and encounters with law enforcement (eg, charged, arrested, convicted), or confinement (in juvenile detention, jail, or prison) [3,4,88,110]. In a series of 415 patients, 14 percent of children and 60 percent of adolescents and adults reported encounters with law enforcement [88].
●Problems with alcohol or drugs and/or inpatient alcohol or drug treatment. In a series of 415 patients, 35 percent of adolescents and adults reported problems with alcohol or drugs [88].
●Problems with sensory processing [35,132]. These may contribute to many behavioral problems, including sleep difficulties, social deficits, inattention, rule breaking, and aggression, as well as difficulties in activities of daily living [132].
Comorbid mental health conditions — Individuals with an FASD may have comorbid mental health disorders, including conduct disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, anxiety, adjustment disorder, depression, or substance use disorder [4,101,110]. In a series of 1064 patients ≥5 years at the time of FASD diagnosis, 74 percent had documentation of one or more mental health disorders, including ADHD (54 percent), oppositional defiant disorder (9 percent), posttraumatic stress disorder (7 percent), and depression (5 percent) [76]. FASD may increase the severity or complexity of these conditions [78].
Growth retardation — Prenatal or postnatal growth retardation is a characteristic feature of FASD in most diagnostic schema and required for a diagnosis of FAS [3,9,10,133]. It may be part of the clinical constellation of pFAS without documented prenatal alcohol exposure and ND-PAE but is not required for diagnosis (table 1). Poor growth that begins in utero tends to continue through infancy and childhood. Short stature may persist into adolescence and adulthood [76], although the pubertal growth spurt may temporarily mask short stature when the child approaches puberty [90].
In a series of 1400 patients (newborn to adult) with confirmed alcohol exposure evaluated for FASD from a single state (4 percent with FAS, 7 percent with pFAS, 28 percent with static encephalopathy/alcohol-exposed [severe dysfunction without the FAS facial phenotype], and 52 percent with neurodevelopmental disorder/alcohol-exposed [moderate dysfunction without the facial phenotype]), 34 percent had height and/or weight below the 10th percentile [76].
EVALUATION — FASDs usually are diagnosed by clinicians with expertise in FASD and other congenital anomalies/developmental disabilities (eg, developmental-behavioral pediatrician, child neurologist, clinical geneticist/dysmorphologist), generally in the context of a multidisciplinary evaluation [3,9,10,86,134,135].
Accurate diagnosis of FASD is important because [9,86,88,136-139]:
●Early diagnosis is associated with improved outcomes
●It enables interventions and support for the patient and family (eg, job skills training) (see "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Management and prognosis")
●In combination with maternal support and services, it can prevent the birth of subsequent children with an FASD (see "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Management and prognosis", section on 'Prevention')
●Children in whom FASD is excluded can continue to be evaluated for other neurodevelopmental conditions (see 'Differential diagnosis' below)
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has developed a "Flow Diagram for Medical Home Evaluation of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)" to assist the primary care provider in the identification, diagnosis, and referral of a child with a possible FASD [134].
Clinical suspicion — FASD should be considered in children with clinical features associated with FASDs, including [8,9,35,85,140] (see 'Clinical features' above):
●Facial dysmorphism, particularly short palpebral fissures, thin vermillion border, and smooth philtrum (picture 1) (see 'Facial dysmorphism and minor anomalies' above)
●Intrauterine and/or postnatal growth retardation
●Microcephaly
●Structural brain anomaly
●Recurrent nonfebrile seizures
●Developmental, learning, and cognitive problems, including school failure and poor adaptive skills
●Behavioral problems (eg, hyperactivity, impaired executive functioning skills)
●Social-emotional problems
It is particularly important to consider FASD in children with developmental, learning, cognitive, or behavioral problems. In observational studies, behavioral problems associated with FASDs (eg, negative mood, being difficult to handle) were noted by caregivers in infants as young as six months [141,142]. Developmental problems, especially in language and adaptive behaviors, as well as over- or under-responsiveness to sensory input, may be seen during infancy or toddler years [35]. Moreover, caregivers' and teachers' complaints about attention, adaptive, and learning problems were strong predictors of an FASD diagnosis [141,142]. However, in a cross-sectional study with active case ascertainment, although many caregivers were aware of their children's learning and behavioral challenges, only 2 of 222 children who met criteria for FASD had a previous diagnosis [66].
FASD also should be suspected in children with risk factors for FASD, including those with a history of having lived in an orphanage or foster care, those with current or past involvement with child protective services or the juvenile justice system, and those with siblings with an FASD [64,75,77,79,80,134]. Among 547 foster care or adopted children (4 to 18 years of age) who underwent comprehensive evaluation at a mental health clinic specializing in the treatment of high-risk children and adolescents, 28.5 percent were diagnosed with an FASD [80]. Among children ultimately diagnosed with an FASD, 80 percent were previously undiagnosed. (See 'Risk factors' above.)
Given the importance of making an accurate diagnosis and the difficulties in differentiating central nervous system (CNS) effects of prenatal alcohol exposure from other causes of neurodevelopmental disorders, including adverse environmental factors, referral to an FAS/FASD clinic is recommended by the AAP and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [3,4,134]. (See 'Indications for referral' below.)
Pending specialist evaluation, the primary care provider can provide guidance about behavior management and promotion of healthy development, as well as referral for early intervention services. (See "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Management and prognosis", section on 'General recommendations'.)
Comprehensive evaluation — The comprehensive evaluation for FASD is ideally performed in an FAS/FASD clinic by an interdisciplinary team of specialists with expertise in FAS and other congenital anomalies/developmental disabilities [2,8]. The interdisciplinary team may include a developmental-behavioral pediatrician, neurologist, neuropsychologist, speech-language pathologist, occupational therapist, geneticist, and family advocate. The geneticist is particularly helpful in excluding alternative or coexisting diagnoses and determining the need for genetic testing (eg, chromosomal microarray analysis) [94,143,144].
The goals of the comprehensive evaluation include confirmation of prenatal alcohol exposure, exclusion of other diagnoses, identification of comorbidities, and determination of the child's individual neurobehavioral profile of strengths and areas of need, which is helpful in formulating a management plan. (See "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Management and prognosis", section on 'Approach to management'.)
If in-person multidisciplinary evaluation is not available, telehealth may provide improved access [145]. In addition, primary care providers may be able to share facial images with experts electronically, and the school system may be able to provide neurocognitive assessments. For interested clinicians, the AAP provides guidance for developing an FASD team [146]. Training programs may also enable clinicians to improve their diagnostic skills. In the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) program, FASD specialists train healthcare providers and community physicians via interactive videoconference. A preliminary study with 19 community physicians, nurse practitioners, and psychologists suggested that it is a feasible training method, and increased the participants' knowledge and confidence in making an FASD diagnosis [147].
Prenatal alcohol exposure — In most diagnostic schema, documented prenatal alcohol exposure is necessary for a diagnosis of partial fetal alcohol syndrome (pFAS), alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (ARND), alcohol-related birth defects (ARBD), and neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE) [3,10]. FAS, and in some schemas pFAS, can be diagnosed without confirming prenatal alcohol exposure if other criteria are met (table 1) [3,4,9].
●Asking about alcohol exposure – Questions related to alcohol consumption must be asked in a nonjudgmental manner. One approach is to ask the questions in the following sequence, first introducing them with a statement such as, "I ask the caregivers of all of my patients standard health questions so that I can understand factors that may affect their health and the health of their child" [9,13,148-151]:
•General health history (eg, general health, dietary intake, pregnancy history)
•Current drinking patterns
•Drinking patterns before pregnancy
•Drinking patterns during pregnancy
•Gestational age when the mother recognized she was pregnant
Although often not available, critical information about maternal prenatal alcohol consumption includes [2,9,13]:
•The quantity of alcohol consumed per occasion (ie, number of standard drinks per drinking day; a standard drink is defined as 12 ounces [360 mL] of beer or wine cooler, 5 ounces [150 mL] of wine, or 1.5 ounces [45 mL] of liquor)
•The frequency of drinking
•When during the pregnancy the mother drank alcohol
●Definition of prenatal alcohol exposure – A "safe" threshold or pattern of alcohol consumption has not been identified [31,32,152]. Any amount of alcohol may be significant and alcohol has the potential to cause deleterious effects at all stages of gestation. Binge drinking (ie, ≥4 standard drinks on a single occasion) and drinking throughout pregnancy are considered particularly harmful [152-155].
Despite the limitations of available screening tools (eg, geographic variations in definitions for "standard drink" or "prenatal alcohol exposure," increased risk of bias) [156,157], we agree with the 2016 National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) consensus guidelines, which define documented prenatal alcohol exposure as one or more of the following (beginning three months before recognition of pregnancy or a positive pregnancy test documented in the medical record and continuing until delivery) [9]:
•≥6 drinks per week for ≥2 weeks.
•≥3 drinks per occasion on ≥2 occasions.
•Documentation of alcohol-related social or legal problems (eg, history of citations for driving while intoxicated or history of treatment for an alcohol-related condition).
•Documentation of intoxication by blood, breath, or urine alcohol content testing.
•Increased prenatal risk associated with drinking during pregnancy as assessed by a validated screening tool. (See "Screening for unhealthy use of alcohol and other drugs in primary care", section on 'Special populations'.)
Existing biomarkers are not sufficiently sensitive or specific to support clinical use [156,158].
●Sources for documentation of prenatal alcohol exposure – The history of prenatal alcohol exposure can be obtained from the birth mother; family members of the birth mother; foster or adoptive parents; employees of social services agencies who directly observed maternal drinking behavior during pregnancy; or medical records documenting positive blood alcohol levels, alcohol treatment, or social, legal, or medical problems related to drinking during pregnancy [3,8,9]. (See "Alcohol intake and pregnancy", section on 'Screening for alcohol misuse' and "Screening for unhealthy use of alcohol and other drugs in primary care", section on 'Special populations'.)
●Reliable exclusion of prenatal alcohol exposure – Reliable exclusion of prenatal alcohol exposure precludes a diagnosis of FASD [4,8]. Reliable exclusion of prenatal alcohol exposure may occur if the mother knew the date of conception (ie, planned pregnancy) and did not drink alcohol from that day forward or if the mother was prevented from drinking for any reason (eg, incarceration).
●Challenges to confirmation – Confirmation of prenatal alcohol exposure can be challenging for a number of reasons:
•The mother may be uncertain about how much alcohol was consumed after conception but before pregnancy recognition, particularly if the pregnancy was unplanned.
•The mother may under-report alcohol consumption during pregnancy because of fear, shame, guilt, and worry that the child may be removed from her custody.
•The child and mother may have been separated (eg, through foster care, adoption, maternal death, or incarceration); in several case series, as many as 80 percent of children with FAS experience early separation from their biologic parents [76,78,88,92,159].
Physical examination — Physical examination findings included in the criteria for one or more FASD include (table 1) [3,9,10]:
●Facial dysmorphism (short palpebral fissures, thin vermillion border, and smooth philtrum) (picture 1):
•Instructions for measuring palpebral fissure length are available from the FAS Diagnostic and Prevention Network and the AAP toolkit (picture 2); palpebral fissure length can be assessed according to the Thomas chart [160] or, for school-age children, using photographs and computer software [161]. However, palpebral fissure length measured in photographs may be consistently lower than palpebral fissure length measured in person [162,163].
•Thinness of the vermillion border and smoothness of the philtrum are usually assessed with the University of Washington Lip Philtrum Guide (picture 3) [164].
●Growth retardation – Growth retardation is usually defined by height and/or weight ≤10th percentile for age, sex, race/ethnicity (if available), and gestation, although some countries use a lower threshold (eg, <3rd percentile) [157]. Documentation of growth retardation may require obtaining previous growth records and plotting of growth parameters from birth through current age.
●Decreased head circumference – Decreased head circumference is defined by head circumference ≤10th percentile for age and sex or, if weight and height are <10th percentile, by head circumference ≤3rd percentile.
●Neurologic abnormalities, including "hard" neurologic signs (eg, abnormal reflexes, abnormal tone, cranial nerve deficits). (See "Detailed neurologic assessment of infants and children".)
●Structural congenital anomalies that may occur in conjunction with an FASD and are clues to the diagnosis of ARBD. (See 'Structural congenital anomalies and other abnormalities' above.)
In addition, it is important to observe caregiver-child interactions. Many children with an FASD are raised in postnatal environments characterized by high psychosocial stress that can interfere with effective parenting. Observations of caregiver-child interactions may help to identify targets for psychosocial services or intervention. (See "Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Management and prognosis", section on 'Approach to management'.)
Neurocognitive assessment — Developmental and cognitive assessment may be necessary to confirm CNS involvement (table 1), and determine the child's profile of strengths and areas of need [9]. Cognitive testing provides standardized procedures for measuring knowledge and abilities in various areas (eg, reading, writing, math, executive functions, language, comprehension etc). It also may identify areas of difficulty that were not suspected.
Neurocognitive assessment usually is performed by the FAS/FASD clinic or the multidisciplinary team and may include:
●Standardized tests of intellectual and adaptive functioning (table 3)
●Assessment of memory, including working memory
●Assessment of executive function
●Assessment of language
●Assessment of visual motor integration and sensory processing
●Assessment of processing speed
Normal intelligence quotient (IQ) does not exclude FASD if other criteria are met.
Behavioral assessment — Behavior problems in children with an FASD may include [3,40]:
●Difficulty regulating mood
●Problems with executive function
●Inattention, short attention span, hyperactivity, impulsivity, poor impulse control [165,166]
●Irritability or negative affect [167]
●Sleep difficulty [168]
●Impaired social skills
●Indiscriminate social approach [123,124]
●Impaired adaptive functioning
These behavior problems are not pathognomonic for FASD but may help to meet criteria for functional CNS involvement (table 1). (See 'Central nervous system involvement' above.)
Primary care providers can screen for behavior problems using validated behavior screening tests. If the child has a positive behavior screen and the child has a history of prenatal alcohol exposure, referral to an FAS/FASD clinic or multidisciplinary team is warranted. (See 'Indications for referral' below and "Developmental-behavioral surveillance and screening in primary care", section on 'Choice of screening test'.)
DIAGNOSIS
Diagnostic criteria for FASD — The diagnosis of FASD mainly centers on prenatal alcohol exposure as discussed elsewhere (see 'Prenatal alcohol exposure' above) and two or three clinical features (table 1):
●Characteristic facial dysmorphisms (picture 1):
•Short palpebral fissures; instructions for measuring palpebral fissure length are available from the FAS Diagnostic and Prevention Network and the AAP toolkit (picture 2); palpebral fissure length can be assessed according to the Thomas chart [160] or, for school-age children, using photographs and computer software [161]
•Thin vermillion border (University of Washington Lip-Philtrum Guide rank 4 or 5 (picture 3))
•Smooth philtrum (University of Washington Lip-Philtrum Guide rank 4 or 5 (picture 3))
●CNS involvement (structural, neurologic, or functional)
●Growth retardation – Growth retardation is an important clinical feature in most diagnostic schema [3,9,10]; however, it is not included in the 2015 Canadian guidelines for diagnosis of FASD [8]
Criteria needed to make the diagnosis of specific conditions within FASD vary. (See 'Criteria for specific conditions' below.)
However, there is no universally accepted set of diagnostic criteria for FASD [14]. Four diagnostic schemas are widely used:
●The NIAAA consensus guidelines (2005) [12], which were updated in 2016 [9]
●The University of Washington Four-Digit Diagnostic Code [10,169]
●The National Task Force on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Fetal Alcohol Effect (FAS/FAE) [3]
●Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: Canadian Guidelines for Diagnosis [11], which were updated in 2015 (table 2) [8]
Each of the schemas was developed by expert consensus. They all focus on facial dysmorphism and CNS involvement but may differ with respect to inclusion of growth retardation and/or the requirements to fulfill diagnostic criteria (eg, number of facial dysmorphisms, percentile threshold for palpebral fissure, requirements for CNS involvement). In a study of over 2000 first-grade children, there was only slight to fair agreement in FASD diagnoses made according to the updated NIAAA consensus guideline, the Four-Digit system, and the updated Canadian guidelines, which reflects the lack of consistency between existing approaches [170]. The discordance among these criteria [171,172] highlights the importance of obtaining the history of prenatal alcohol exposure [171].
In the absence of universal diagnostic criteria for FASD, the diagnostic criteria for FASD continue to be refined [13,14]. It is important for clinicians to be familiar with the existing diagnostic schemas that describe children with and without facial dysmorphology. Preferences for diagnostic criteria vary locally (eg, the 2015 Canadian guidelines use different nomenclature and diagnostic criteria (table 2) [8]; a Polish guideline is based on the 2016 NIAAA consensus guidelines, the four-digit code, and the Canadian guidelines [157]). Less stringent criteria are more inclusive but may lead to over-diagnosis; more stringent criteria may lead to under-diagnosis. This highlights the need for clinicians with expertise in assessing FASD to be involved in the evaluation and ongoing care of children with suspected FASD. (See 'Indications for referral' below.)
In addition to fulfilling the diagnostic criteria, other causes of facial dysmorphism, CNS abnormalities, growth retardation, and structural congenital anomalies (eg, genetic syndromes, adverse environmental factors) must be considered, as well as the possibility of FASD co-occurring with such conditions [3,40,143]. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)
Criteria for specific conditions — The major diagnostic criteria for specific conditions within FASD are as follows:
●Fetal alcohol syndrome – Diagnosis of FAS requires at least two features of facial dysmorphology (ie, short palpebral fissures, thin vermillion border, and smooth philtrum (picture 1)), growth retardation, and CNS involvement (structural, neurologic, or functional abnormalities). If all of these criteria are met, prenatal alcohol exposure need not be documented (table 1). (See 'Clinical features' above.)
●Partial fetal alcohol syndrome – Children with pFAS have documented prenatal alcohol exposure but do not meet all of the criteria for FAS. Diagnosis of pFAS requires at least two of the facial characteristics of FAS (picture 1), growth retardation or CNS involvement, and documented prenatal alcohol exposure. However, the 2016 NIAAA consensus guidelines also permit pFAS to be diagnosed without confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure if there are at least two cardinal facial features, growth retardation or structural brain involvement, and neurobehavioral impairment (table 1) [9]. (See 'Prenatal alcohol exposure' above and 'Clinical features' above.)
●Alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder – Children with ARND have documented prenatal alcohol exposure and CNS involvement, which requires only neurobehavioral impairment. (See 'Prenatal alcohol exposure' above and 'Central nervous system involvement' above.)
●Neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure – Children with ND-PAE have confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure and impaired neurocognitive function (eg, intellectual disability, executive function, memory, visual-spatial reasoning), self-regulation (eg, mood, attention, impulse control), and adaptive function (eg, communication, daily living skills, motor skills) (table 4A-C) [13]. In addition, the impairments must affect function and must not be due to other teratogens or genetic or medical conditions [16]. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)
Children can be diagnosed with both FAS and ND-PAE; the diagnosis of ND-PAE was created primarily to capture the mental health effects of prenatal alcohol exposure [15].
●Alcohol-related birth defects – Children with ARBD have documented prenatal alcohol exposure and one specific major malformation from intrauterine alcohol exposure. (See 'Prenatal alcohol exposure' above and 'Structural congenital anomalies and other abnormalities' above.)
Potential diagnostic tools — The clinical diagnosis of FASD can be challenging. There is a wide spectrum of phenotypic presentations and the majority of affected children do not present with physical findings (see 'Clinical features' above). Tools to assist in making the diagnosis of FASD may thus be useful. The FASD-Tree is a web-based tool that uses information from physical examination, and parent-completed questionnaires on behavior and adaptive functioning to calculate a risk score for FASD (on a scale of 0 to 5) as well as a yes/no result for FASD based on a decision-tree [173-175]. The tool's overall accuracy rate for diagnosing FASD versus non-FASD was 77 percent with a sensitivity and specificity of 91 and 53 percent, respectively [173].
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Facial features — The facial dysmorphology seen in fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) and partial fetal alcohol syndrome (pFAS) can resemble other genetic conditions (table 5) [4,176].
Growth retardation and microcephaly — Other causes of prenatal and postnatal growth retardation and microcephaly in children are discussed separately:
●Prenatal growth retardation (table 6) (see "Fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA) newborns" and "Fetal growth restriction: Evaluation")
●Postnatal growth retardation (table 7A-B) (see "Causes of short stature" and "Diagnostic approach to children and adolescents with short stature" and "Poor weight gain in children older than two years in resource-abundant settings", section on 'Diagnostic approach' and "Poor weight gain in children younger than two years in resource-abundant settings: Etiology and evaluation", section on 'Causes')
●Microcephaly (table 8) (see "Microcephaly in infants and children: Etiology and evaluation" and "Microcephaly: A clinical genetics approach")
Neurobehavioral phenotype — Neurobehavioral problems in FASD may be related to prenatal alcohol exposure, a coexisting condition, environmental factors, a different neurodevelopmental disorder, or a combination of these factors [40]. The characteristic facial features help to distinguish FAS and pFAS from other causes of neurobehavioral problems. However, in children who lack characteristic facial features, it may not be possible to differentiate neurobehavioral disorders associated with prenatal alcohol exposure from other neurobehavioral disorders and/or neurobehavioral disorders associated with environmental factors. The history of prenatal alcohol exposure is crucial to the differential diagnosis in this situation. (See 'Comprehensive evaluation' above.)
Referral to a clinician with expertise in FASD and a broad array of congenital anomalies/developmental disabilities is warranted to ensure appropriate evaluation and diagnosis. (See 'Indications for referral' below.)
In children who lack characteristic facial features, it may not be possible to differentiate neurobehavioral disorders caused by prenatal alcohol exposure from neurobehavioral disorders with other or unknown etiologies, including [13,177]:
●Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (see "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical features')
●Autism spectrum disorder (see "Autism spectrum disorder in children and adolescents: Clinical features")
●Global developmental delay or intellectual disability (see "Intellectual disability (ID) in children: Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis")
●Oppositional defiant disorder (see "Oppositional defiant disorder: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, course, and diagnosis")
●Conduct disorder
●Mood disorders (eg, depression, bipolar disorder) (see "Pediatric unipolar depression: Epidemiology, clinical features, assessment, and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical features' and "Pediatric bipolar disorder: Clinical manifestations and course of illness", section on 'Clinical presentation')
●Disinhibited social engagement disorder
●Reactive attachment disorder
●Posttraumatic stress disorder (see "Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: Epidemiology, clinical features, assessment, and diagnosis")
●Sleep disorder (see "Assessment of sleep disorders in children")
●Substance use disorder (see "Substance use disorder in adolescents: Epidemiology, clinical features, assessment, and diagnosis")
●Schizophrenia
Environmental factors that may contribute to a neurobehavioral profile similar to that in FASD include [3,4]:
●Early adversity, trauma, and loss
●Exposure to multiple substances in utero (see "Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS): Clinical features and diagnosis")
●Poor prenatal environment
●Disrupted home environment (eg, placement in foster care) (see "Comprehensive health care for children in foster care", section on 'Complex childhood trauma and toxic stress')
●Poverty
●Child abuse or neglect
●Ongoing caregiver substance use
These environmental factors may contribute to complex childhood trauma and "toxic stress," which affects areas of the brain involved in executive function, memory, emotional regulation, attention, and stress reactivity [178,179]. It is not always possible to tease out the specific contribution of prenatal alcohol exposure from other environmental factors. However, a detailed psychosocial history may be helpful, particularly if central nervous system abnormalities were present before the exposure to adverse environmental factors [4]. (See "Comprehensive health care for children in foster care", section on 'Complex childhood trauma and toxic stress'.)
INDICATIONS FOR REFERRAL — Children who are suspected to have an FASD should be referred to a qualified team of specialists for thorough assessment that includes examination for facial dysmorphic features and a complete neurobehavioral evaluation [3,8]. These specialists may consist of developmental behavioral pediatricians, psychiatrists, psychologists, neurologists, clinical geneticists, speech and language pathologists, occupational therapists, social workers, and educational therapists [3]. If a specialized FASD team is not available, we suggest referral to a local specialist with expertise in FASD (eg, a developmental/behavioral pediatrician, clinical geneticist) for initial evaluation.
Simultaneous with the referral for multidisciplinary FASD evaluation, the child should be referred for intervention services. In the United States, intervention services may be provided by Early Intervention (for children younger than three years), preschool special education services, or through the public school system. (See "Developmental-behavioral surveillance and screening in primary care", section on 'Early intervention or special education services'.)
Indications for referral to an FASD multidisciplinary team include [3,4,180]:
●Prenatal alcohol exposure (as defined in the 2016 National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism consensus guidelines) [9] (see 'Prenatal alcohol exposure' above)
For children with less than minimal exposure and no characteristic features (characteristic facial dysmorphism, growth retardation, central nervous system [CNS] abnormalities), the child's growth and development should be closely monitored. (See "Developmental-behavioral surveillance and screening in primary care", section on 'Follow-up'.)
●Parental or caregiver concerns for FASD (even when prenatal alcohol exposure is unknown or denied)
●Unknown prenatal alcohol exposure and:
•Characteristic facial dysmorphology (picture 1) (see 'Facial dysmorphism and minor anomalies' above)
•One or more facial features in addition to growth deficits (see 'Growth retardation' above)
•One or more facial features in addition to CNS abnormalities (see 'Central nervous system involvement' above)
If multidisciplinary evaluation is not available, primary care providers may be able to share facial images with experts electronically, and the school system may be able to provide neurocognitive assessments. For interested clinicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics provides guidance for developing an FASD team [146].
RESOURCES — Additional information about FASD is available from the following websites:
●In the United States:
•American Academy of Pediatrics Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Program
•The 2015 Canadian Guidelines for diagnosis of FASD across the lifespan
•The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
•University of Washington FAS Diagnostic and Prevention Network
●In the United Kingdom:
•National Organisation for FASD
•Locate alcohol addiction services (United Kingdom)
●In Australia:
•Australian guide to the diagnosis of FASD, including E-learning modules
SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder" and "Society guideline links: Alcohol consumption".)
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient education" and the keyword[s] of interest.)
●Basics topic (see "Patient education: Fetal alcohol syndrome (The Basics)")
SUMMARY
●Terminology – Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is an umbrella term that encompasses the range of physical, mental health, behavioral, and cognitive effects that can occur in individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure. FASDs include fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), partial fetal alcohol syndrome (pFAS), alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder (ARND), alcohol-related birth defects (ARBD), and neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE). (See 'Terminology' above.)
●Pathogenesis – Alcohol is a teratogen with irreversible central nervous system (CNS) effects. It has the potential to cause deleterious effects at all stages of gestation. The effects may vary depending upon the quantity and pattern of alcohol consumption, maternal and fetal genetics, maternal age, maternal nutrition, and maternal smoking, among other factors. (See 'Pathogenesis' above.)
●Risk factors – Risk factors for FASD include having a sibling with an FASD, having lived in an orphanage or been in foster care, or current or past involvement with child protective services. (See 'Risk factors' above.)
●Clinical suspicion – FASD should be suspected in children with clinical features of FASD, including (see 'Clinical features' above and 'Clinical suspicion' above):
•Facial dysmorphism, particularly short palpebral fissures, thin vermillion border, and smooth philtrum (picture 1)
•Intrauterine and/or postnatal growth retardation
•Microcephaly
•Structural brain anomaly
•Recurrent nonfebrile seizures
•Developmental, learning, and cognitive problems, including school failure
•Behavioral problems (eg, hyperactivity, impaired executive functioning skills)
•Social-emotional problems
●Diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis – Diagnostic criteria focus on facial dysmorphology (picture 3), growth retardation, CNS abnormalities, and prenatal alcohol exposure (table 1). (See 'Diagnostic criteria for FASD' above and 'Comprehensive evaluation' above.)
In addition, it is important to consider other causes of facial dysmorphism (table 5), growth retardation, and CNS effects. (See 'Differential diagnosis' above.)
●Indications for referral – Children who are suspected to have an FASD should be referred to a qualified team of specialists for thorough assessment that includes examination for facial dysmorphic features, growth, and a complete neurobehavioral evaluation, which includes intelligence quotient (IQ) testing, an assessment of memory (including working memory), executive function, language, visual motor integration, functional and adaptive skills, and processing speed. (See 'Indications for referral' above and 'Neurocognitive assessment' above.)
46 : Imaging the impact of prenatal alcohol exposure on the structure of the developing human brain.
56 : Brain structural differences in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and its subtypes.
116 : Everyday memory difficulties in children and adolescents with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.
142 : Factors predictive of a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder diagnosis: Parent and teacher ratings.
Do you want to add Medilib to your home screen?