One-year access to more than 500 world journals available in the system
-
http://medilib.ir
- Duration of Time : 365 Day
Price : 300$- Special Price : 100$
Inside This Issue
doi : 10.1016/S1936-8798(21)00614-2
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages A12-A17
Preventing Coronary Obstruction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the Multicenter International BASILICA Registry
Jaffar M.KhanBM BCh, PhDabVasilis C.BabaliarosMDcAdam B.GreenbaumMDcChristianSpiesMDdDavidDanielsMDdJeremiah P.DeptaMD, MPHSeJ. BradleyOldemeyerMDfBrianWhisenantMDgJames M.McCabeMDhKamran I.MuhammadMDiIsaacGeorgeMDjPaulMahoneyMDkJonasLanzMDlRoger J.LahamMDmPinak B.ShahMDnAdnanChhatriwallaMDoShahramYazdaniMDpGeorgeHanzelMDq…TobyRogersBM BCh, PhDab
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.035
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 941-948
This study sought to determine the safety of the BASILICA (bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction) procedure.
Is BASILICA the Standard for Preventing Coronary Obstruction in High-Risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement??
OleDe BackerMD, PhDLarsS?ndergaardMD, DMSc
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.028
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 949-951
Age-Related Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the SwissTAVI Registry
AdrianAttinger-TollerMDa?EnricoFerrariMDbc?DavidTuellerMDdChristianTemplinMDeOlivierMullerMDfFabianNietlispachMD, PhDgStefanToggweilerMDhStéphaneNobleMDiMarcoRoffiMDiRabanJegerMDjChristophHuberMDkThierryCarrelMDlThomasPilgrimMD, MScmPeterWenaweserMDnMarioTogniMDaoStéphaneCookMDaoDikHegPhDpStephanWindeckerMDm…StefanStorteckyMDm†
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.042
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 952-960
The aim of this study was to investigate age-related outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as assessed in a nationwide, prospective, multicenter cohort study.
Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Does Age Matter??
Ricardo O.Esc?rcegaMDaBrianHummelMDb
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.031
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 961-963
Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Supra-Annular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Gilbert H.L.TangMD, MSc, MBAaAdityaSenguptaMDaSophia L.AlexisMDaVinayak N.BapatMBBSbDavid H.AdamsMDaSamin K.SharmaMDaAnnapoorna S.KiniMDaSusheel K.KodaliMDbBaselRamlawiMDcHemalGadaMD, MBAdAmit N.VoraMD, MPHdJohn K.ForrestMDeRyan K.KapleMDeFangLiuMD, MSfMichael J.ReardonMDg
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.040
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 964-976
The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in the TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry in patients undergoing supra-annular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for de novo stenosis or failed surgical bioprostheses (transcatheter aortic valve [TAV]–in–surgical aortic valve [SAV]).
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Has It Become Obsolete??
JulienTernacleMD, PhDaAmr E.AbbasMDbPhilippePibarotDVM, PhDc
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.039
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 977-980
Validation of the 2019 Expert Consensus Algorithm for the Management of Conduction Disturbances After TAVR
DanielMalebrancheMD, MScabJoannaBartkowiakMDaChristophRyffelMDaBenediktBernhardMDaMamdouhElsmaanMDaNikolasNozicaMDaTaishiOkunoMDaJonasLanzMDaFabienPrazMDaStefanStorteckyMDaLorenzR?berMD, PhDaDikHegPhDcLaurentRotenMD, MBAaStephanWindeckerMDaThomasPilgrimMD, MSca?TobiasReichlinMDa?
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.010
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 981-991
The aim of this study was to validate the 2019 consensus algorithm in a large cohort of contemporary transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients.
Managing Conduction Disturbances After TAVR: Toward a Tailored Strategy?
JosepRodés-CabauMD, PhDabGuillemMuntané-CarolMDaFrançoisPhilipponMDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.053
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 992-994
Catheter Selection and Angiographic Views for Anomalous Coronary Arteries: A Practical Guide
ItsikBen-DorMDaGabyWeissmanMDbTobyRogersMD, PhDacMichaelSlackMDdAugustoPichardMDaNaamaBen-DoraHayderHashimMDaNelsonBernardoMDaLowell F.SatlerMDaRonWaksmanMDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.054
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 995-1008
Although congenital coronary artery anomalies are relatively rare, they are the second most common cause of sudden cardiac death among young athletes. When encountered in the cardiac catherization laboratory, they are often challenging to selectively engage, requiring multiple catheters, plus increased contrast volume and radiation exposure. In the setting of acute coronary syndromes, it is not infrequent that percutaneous intervention is delayed because of the inability to engage an anomalous coronary artery. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive and concise overview of coronary artery anomalies, with particular attention to diagnostic and guide catheter selection for each type of anomaly and recommendations on how to recognize the vessel course angiographically.
Impact of Coronary Artery Tortuosity on Outcomes Following Stenting: A Pooled Analysis From 6 Trials
MaayanKonigsteinMDabOriBen-YehudaMDacdBj?rnRedforsMD, PhDaceGary S.MintzMDaMahesh V.MadhavanMDacMordechaiGolombMDaThomasMcAndrewPhDaZixuanZhangMSaDavid E.KandzariMDfJames B.HermillerMDgMartin B.LeonMDacGregg W.StoneMDah
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.027
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1009-1018
The authors sought to determine whether coronary artery tortuosity negatively affects clinical outcomes after stent implantation.
Coronary Tortuosity and Long-Term Post-Stent Risk: What Is the Connection??
Stephen G.EllisMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.015
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1019-1020
Prediction of Coronary Stent Underexpansion by Pre-Procedural Intravascular Ultrasound–Based Deep Learning
Hyun-SeokMinPhDaDongminRyuMSaSoo-JinKangMDaJune-GooLeePhDbJi HyeongYooBSaHyungjooChoBSaDo-YoonKangMDaPil HyungLeeMDaJung-MinAhnMDaDuk-WooParkMDaSeung-WhanLeeMDaYoung-HakKimMDaCheol WhanLeeMDaSeong-WookParkMDaSeung-JungParkMDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.033
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1021-1029
The aim of this study was to develop pre-procedural intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)–based models for predicting the occurrence of stent underexpansion.
Is Deep Learning Coming to Guide Your Coronary Intervention??
John J.LopezMDaMilanSonkaPhDb
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.029
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1030-1032
Rescue of Threatened Coronary Obstruction Due to Sinus Sequestration: Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Sabeeda M.KadavathMDaEdward F.TerrienMDaFrank P.IttlemanMDbRonyLahoudMDaNewton P.PhuongMDaHarold L.DauermanMDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.020
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1033-1035
Surgical Resection of Prosthetic Valve Leaflets Under Direct Vision (SURPLUS) for Redo TAVR
LuigiPirelliMDCraig L.BasmanMDDerek R.BrinsterMDDennyWangBSNiravPatelMDS. JacobScheinermanMDChad A.KligerMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.026
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1036-1037
Direct Visualization of TAVR-Related Coronary Artery Management Techniques in Reanimated Beating Hearts
Jorge ZhingreSanchezPhDabFrancescoBurzottaMD, PhDcdThomasValenzuelaBSaJens FlenstedLassenMD, PhDeTinenIlesPhDaPaul A.IaizzoPhDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.045
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages e87-e91
TAVR in a Patient With Quadricuspid Aortic Stenosis: The Role of Patient-Specific Computer Simulation in Treatment Planning and Outcome Prediction
YuHanMDaJoana MariaRibeiroMD, MScbcPeter P.T.de JaegereMDbGejunZhangMDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.014
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages e93-e95
“Matryoshka” Valve-in-Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Do-It-Yourself Catheter to Cross Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis Stenosis
ShunsukeAoiMDMeiChauMDChristopherTanakaMDAzeemLatibMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.038
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages e97-e100
COVID-19–Positive Patient and Hypoxemia: Are Lungs Always to Be Blamed?
MalekKassMDaVirendra K.AryaMDbAshish H.ShahMD, MD-Researcha
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.044
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages e101-e102
Acute Coronary Tree Thrombosis After Vaccination for COVID-19
MateuszTajstraMD, PhDaJerzyJaroszewiczMD, PhDbMariuszG?siorMD, PhDa
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.003
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages e103-e104
Mortality After Discharge Home and Within 30 Days After TAVR: The Plot Thickens
AshishPershadMD, MS
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.038
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Page 1038
Comments on Evaluating Out-of-Hospital 30-Day Mortality After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
JeffreyShuhaiberMDBrian H.NathansonPhD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.007
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1039-1040
Reply: On Evaluating Out-of-Hospital 30-Day Mortality After TAVR
SaifAnwaruddinMDNimeshDesaiMD, PhDSreekanthVemulapalliMDMichael J.ReardonMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.037
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1040-1041
The Concept of Securing Evidence Remote of the Crime Scene
Marius RetoBiglerMDEricBuffleMDGeorge C.M.SiontisMD, PhDChristianSeilerMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.054
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1041-1042
Could Distal Radial Artery Access do More Than “Just” Reduce Rates of Radial Artery Occlusion?
Garry W.HamiltonMBBSOmarFarouqueMBBS, PhD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.055
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1042-1043
Radial Artery Occlusion With Distal Radial Access Compared to Conventional Transradial Access: A Pathophysiology Outlook
Gregory A.SguegliaMD, PhDAngeloSantoliquidoMDAchilleGaspardoneMD, MPhilAngelaDi GiorgioMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.040
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Page 1043
The Importance of Little Details
AndreaPacchioniMDJorgeSanz SanchezMD, PhDGregory A.SguegliaMD, PhD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.036
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Page 1044
Reply: Distal Radial Access to Prevent Conventional Radial Artery Occlusion
GueringEid-LidtMDAgustin RiveraRodr?guezMDJoaqu?n JimenezCastellanosMDJulio I.Farjat PasosMDJorgeGasparMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.018
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1044-1045
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant Depth Measurements Differ by Aortography Versus Computed Tomography
Amit N.VoraMD, MPHGilbert H.L.TangMD, MSc, MBAMichael J.ReardonMDG. MichaelDeebMDSteven J.YakubovMDJianHuangMD, MSJulianneSpencerPhDHemalGadaMD, MBA
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.035
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1045-1047
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Combined Chronic Kidney and Liver Disease
AymanElbadawiMD†MohammedElzeneiniMD†RaviThakkerMDMinaShnodaMDMohamedOmerMDHend I.ShahinMDSamir R.KapadiaMDNeal S.KleimanMDMichael J.ReardonMDSachin S.GoelMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.009
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1047-1049
Novel Computed Tomography Classification for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration: Guiding Trial of Anticoagulation or Reintervention
MakotoNakashimaMDMathewWilliamsMDYuxinHeMDRunDuMDMuhamedSaricMDCezarStaniloaeMDMichaelQuerijeroMScIllyaPushkarMPHAnnaKapitmanBAHasanJilaihawiMD
doi : 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.023
Volume 14, Issue 9, 10 May 2021, Pages 1050-1052
